Why John Brown Chose Violence :: essays research papers

Why do you look at that caper brown believed that the touch in the U.S. at the time could only be solved by bloodshed and non compromise?      I believe that there argon many reasons why John brownness believed that violence was the only path he could prevail in the fight to end slavery in the United States. First of all at this time in history, issues were sorrowful fairly quickly. As soon as Kansas was to become a territory, supporters from two the North and South rushed to settle on the land and set about to gain control of the vote in the area. Secondly, it probably seemed that any attempts at compromise at that time had not, and would not, get very far in the issue. Lastly, the most prominent reason I believe that John Brown felt violence was the only answer, was because of his belief in God. As he stated in his speech to the courts during his trial, he felt that what he did was not wrong. Sacrificing his life was worth it even if it was just one s tep towards mop up slavery, something that was so cruel and wicked anyway, his violence was no worse than the slavery.     When the Kansas-Nebraska mold was introduced in the U.S., the North was upset because the new territories would probably be pro-slavery. As soon as they could, both sides of the issue sent in settlers to try and gain control. This race for Kansas made the race to make a final exam decision on the issue of slavery in the U.S. an even more urgent issue. This battle to decide what side the two new territories would be on probably pushed the issue so profound it caused a carry on of discomfort and probably hurried people like John Brown into making decisions quickly, because people were afraid. I believe that the rush to make a ruling for or against slavery was one reason why John Brown chose bloodshed over compromise.      The second reason I believe Brown picked violence over negotiation was because of the lack of commu nication. It probably seemed a hopeless endeavor to even try to correspond with the South on the issue, especially after violence had already begun in many places not to mention in the act of slavery itself. It would have been very hard for either side to civilly speak or negotiate with the foe in an reasonable manner.