Professional Leadership Journal – Narcissism and Machiavellianism Assessments

According to Nahavandi (2012), privatealities with an elevated score on the scale atomic number 18 relaxed using several resources to accomplish their soulfulness aims. The Machiavellian (Mach) scale measures an individuals willingness to put self-interests and his or her preferences above the interests of the group and a persons ability to influence and manipulate others for personal gain (Nahavandi, 2012).An individual with a high Mach score might fool an absence of morals and truthfulness and both of these are necessities of operative management. As I realised the two different opinions, I was astonished by my results. I complete the Machiavellianism Assessment first, I scored a 23 and according to the text an reason competent score is 24. My score shows that I score within the average plod and that I am willing to put my self-interests aside and manoeuver as a group to reach a goal.I then completed the vanity assessments and scored a 118, which completely shook me, Iv e never considered myself a selfish person, just according to this data I am in feature that way. Narcissistic people love the idea of having power over people, but I am the total opposite, I would rather be a team player than a leader. But I do have some of the traits that constitute me as a narcissist. As a coming(prenominal) public health leader, my Machiavellianism Assessment should be high and my Narcissism assessment should be low.In any public health situation being able to put your self-interests to the side helps to alleviate unwanted stress and it also helps to contemplate the situation carefully. Nahavandi (2012) states that positive narcissistic leaders may have an amplify sense of self and entitlement, but they use their self-confidence, power, and influence to achieve goals, much the same way a moderate Machiavellian would. This seems more same what I strive to do in my life and in my work life.