Landscape Urbanism

This young period, computer computer computer architecture gives attention non only on creating new designs on buildings and structures but on reinventing the milieu as rise up by taming the nature and aestheticizing them for mans use and pleasure. Architects understand arts and environmental care which they formed together to reflect a elaboration and history in the midst of modernization and industrialization. This is because people begun to reject the complexness of urban life and the consequence of global capitalism.Landscape urbanism is one area of architecture which be rises significant in the overall formation of a buildings construction. Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, defined ornament urbanism as a theory of urbanism arguing that grace is more capable of organizing the city and enhancing the urban experience. Its purpose is to create an environment for human to enjoy, live and give way thus making the city or urban apparent from rural areas. This concept was elaborated by Charles Waldheim in his book in which he stated that decorate urbanism is the union of grace with urbanism which promises new relational and systematic workings across territories of vast musical scale and scope, situating the parts in relation to the whole (p. 33). In his explanation, he evince that the concept lies on mobilizing the new ecologies of our future metropolitan regions (p. 33). Ad Graafland, Leslie Jaye Kavanaugh and George Baird on the other ha nd, described the term as a schema that the overlaying of ecological and urban strategies can offer a means by which projects may create new systems of interconnected nedeucerks that complement the existing structures (p. 585).Thus, ornament urbanism is integration in the architectural design of the evocative power of landscape and the principles of ecology it is a celebration of diversity or urban life by discovering and articulating the aesthetic appreciation and expression of urban life. It is indeed sust ainability that is pickings place in a city in a technological way by giving it a character in betwixt buildings and public places.Why Landscape Urbanism Emerged in ArchitectureThe discipline of landscape urbanism according to Charles Waldheim has emerged from landscape architecture but with greater consideration of cultural and historical as well as rude(a) and ecological (p. 127). Waldheim strongly pointed out that it has emerged from architecture because, the concept of landscape urbanism lies strongly on one function of architecture as a device in urban transformation (p. 127).Landscape urbanism has come out from the very idea of landscape architecture according to Richard Weller is comparatively ineffectual in reshaping the world and seems nonetheless theoretically correct and fitting in its aspiration (p. 71), because of the influence of capitalism and traditional hegemony of engineering and architecture. In the aforesaid(prenominal) way, Weller believed that landscape ur banism alone could prepare and practically capable of collapsing the differentiate between planning and design (p. 71).Igor Marjanovic, Lesley Naa Norle Lokko clearly pointed out that landscape urbanism is distinct from landscape architecture in a way that the former is not traditional and it even looks at the contemporary city and its problems and tries to define the realizable contributions that architects can make (p. 24). Urbanism looks at the city and responds to aspect of popular burnish while architecture proposes big structures derived from everyday consumer culture these two work hand in hand for one goal which, the emphasis is on aesthetic and position of public places within union for human solacement that feed human spirit.Comparison and Contrast between the jet de la Villette and Downsview setThe two considered great models in terms of landscape urbanism are the putting green de la Villette by Bernard Tschumi and Downsview Park by Bruce Mau.Heather Stimmier-Hall narrated that La Villette was built in an prone quarrysite or dump area and at the same time slaughterhouses. The put which was designed by Bernard Tschumi, was redeveloped and opened in 1986 as a modern city park in Paris dedicated to science, arts and merriment (p. 96). In the description made by Stimmier-Hall, Parc de la Villette does not submit gates or walls it has mini-forests, bamboo groves and vast lawn in its seventy acres of land. In that vast of land, it has numerous museums, concert halls and whimsical playground. At the entrance of the science and technology museum was the sphere La Geode Cinema that mirrors the green grass and dirty skies. The author added that Parc de la Villette has all there is to see and do (p. 96).Downsview Park on the other hand, is a former Canadian military trading floor at the north end of Toronto, Canada since 1929 and in 1996, it was closed for renovation. Downsview Park is roughly 586 acres or 237 hectares that is underutilized trac t of land. With the initiative of its parent company, it became very chief(prenominal) place in the heart of Toronto. It is committed to sustain education and community development and awareness by offering venues for backyard birds, eco-footprints, butterfly landing, tree city, intrinsic habitats and wildlife, history and walking tours. Both children and adults are accommodated in this place for picky civic activities (Parc Downsview Park). Downsview Park is committed as a unique recreational green plaza, a safe and peaceful place, developed according to the principles of environmental, economic and tender sustainability, for Canadian to enjoy in all seasons (Parc Downsview Park).These two great and fine parks were both renovated from once unproductive and underutilized ground. Both won the awards for macrocosm the largest park that give emphasis on green open space for appreciation of nature though domestic. These two parks serve same purposes which are to house special an d big events from cultural to sports. Both fuddle museums and landscape designs.On the other hand, they differ in many ways. (1) First, they differ in emphasis in aesthetical concept. Downsview Park promotes the social and natural histories that supports natural ecology it does not intent to change the site but obviously to inaugurate the transformation of it ( new wave Alen Institute). Parc de la Villettes design suggests the conventional founding of a park designed to express the fact that it is artificial and domesticated (Berman, 1999), meaning it has a lot of man-made design to make it beautiful. (2) Downsview Park retains the old military buildings which are kept for special uses such as for cultural, recreational and community while Park de la Villette is a supply renovation of a place in which the relics of the old place cannot be seen in the place. (3) Park de la Villette is completely constructed and Downsview Park is set for raise development which will last after ma ny more years. (4)Lastly, Park de la Villette is privately have while Downsview Park is government owned and controlled yet self-supporting.Work CitedBerman, Jay 1999. Le Parc de la Villette, Paris. http//www.galinsky.com/buildings/villette/Downsview Park International Design Competition, Van Alen Institute. http//www.vanalen.org/exhibits/downsview.htmGraafland, A., Jaye Kayanaugh, L. and Baird, G. 2006. Crossover Architecture, Urbanism, Technology. Netherlands 010 Publishers.Gauzin-Muller, Dominique, 2004. Sustainable Architecture and Urbanism Concepts, Technologies, Examples.Landscape Urbanism. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. http//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landscape_urbanismMarjanovic, I. and Norle Lokko, L. 2003. The Portfolio An Architecture scholarly persons Handbook. Elsevier Ltd.Stimmer-Hall, Heather, 2004. Adventure Guide. England Hunter Publishing, Inc. Waldheim, Charles, 2006. The Landscape Urbanism Reader. USA Princeton Architectural fight Making it a Reality. Parc Down sview Park Inc. (PDP). Canada, 2005/http//www.yorku.ca/mclaughlin/documents/downsviewpark.pdf