Benefits of Non Verbal Communication Essay

Non verbal conversation is defined as authorized ways that a person communicates his thoughts and meanings without actually saying anything. These are the problematical clues that can help an investigating officer uncover a right while questioning a suspect or witness or can lead him to more questions that will aid the investigating team. Programs such(prenominal) as CSI have shown us how police officers and wickedness exposure investigators kick down contradicting, complementing, substituting, accenting, or regulating verbal messages.An investigating officer will gather immensely from being familiar with these methods because of the way a crime scene is about often chaotic and witnesses who are being questi unitaryd are traffic with fear of being implicated in the case or perhaps, toilsome to cover their own involvement in the case. A sample of a contradicting non verbal communication that he can look out for has to do with the way a witness recalls the events as it t ranspired in a genuine case. When a witness is looking down while relating the events transpired, that witness is most likely creating a memory.A person recalling a memory commonly looks upward when trying to remember events, places, and situations. Under such circumstances, he should recognize notes and make sure to verify all the events by interviewing other bulk who might attest to the validity of the statements previously made. He may also consider the tone of voice of a person being interrogated. When a person is trying to hide a truth, there is a genuine intonation and nervousness in the voice that usually causes it to raise in tone by a pitch or so.The officer must make sure to gain the trust and confidence of the witness or accused prior to questioning to keep the person off moderate in order to get the most truthful answers out of them. A parole officer on the other hand must be highly observant and familiar with the psychological profile of his parolee that could manoeuver his behavior during certain situations in order to easily recognize the signs being displayed by the parolee when he comes in for his weekly reports.While face-off with the parolee, he should observe his complementing and accenting behavior. Particularly the first time the person enters the room. Does he shake your hand? Does he make eye affaire? Does he seem nervous and on the edge? All of these could leave up to a specific non verbal message that will give one an insight into the real score behind what the parolee wants to present as truth. He should then react accordingly by tempt the person to become more open and share more selective information with him.In the event that the parolee begins to display accenting behavior such as hitting the table or throwing something, he must be prepared to restrain the person and try to snap him out of his mood. The one non verbal communication that both an investigating and parole officer must be quick to realize are the regul ating non verbal communication tools. Such actions could be a simple look of question, a leading of despair in the eyes, or the wringing of hands of the person spoken to. formerly recognized, he must be prepared to follow up on the subtle messages either by asking follow up questions or reassuring the person that the officer is in charge and everything is under control. volume say that there is no such thing as the perfective tense crime. I have to agree with that statement because any officer who is familiar and highly observant when it comes to non verbal communication cues will easily be able to follow up on subtle clues not include in the physical evidence present at a crime scene or parole interview.