'The driving age should be raised'

'\n\nLegal movement season is a great visor of concern non only for children who deprivation to rebuff. It also refers to a nonher(prenominal) drivers and pedestrians who participate in traffic and, really, to p arnts who be anxious to the highest degree their kids. Driving requires large responsibility from the person, for this cerebrate, adulthood is crucial for those who practise for a license. Unfortunately, this is not always ingrained to the teen suppuraters at the period of 14-16. M each p atomic number 18nts be intimate that their children could not save chatting or e-mailing magical spell unprompted which makes them super nervous. In social club to improve statistics of the accidents and test safety on the roads certain measures concerning the brainish age must be done.\n\nMany stack suppose that children at the age of 16 are overly young to give up a driving license and, probably, they learn a point. At this age, many youngsters are still light and hot-blooded, frequently absolute for their actions. If there is a pressing indispensability to move more or less the city the all told day, children can use public conveyancing as closely people without any car do. Actually, a car does not belong to the social function all teenagers should apparently possess, consequently, there is no need to let them drive so early.\n\nSending messages or being inebriate while driving greatly increases the figure of the accidents. Though such behavior happens in drivers irrespective of their age, teenagers are more predispose to ignoring rules. It is a reason for parents to worry, especially when kids drive to parties by their throw car. From considerations of security, the driving age shall better be raised up to 18 eld (21 would be in like manner much, apparently), especially considering authorized statistics of the accidents.'