Machiavelli, Marx, Locke, Religion And Secularism

Use Machiavelli`s `the Prince , Marx` `commie military personne looksto , and Locke`s ` join Treatise on Civil regime` . Compare and contrast the grandeur of piety and secularism in the thoughts of these authors as they wrote these spirtsOxford Advanced Learner s lexicon (1985 ) defines the actors line secularism and organized faith as secularism is the view that morality and levy should non be based on religious belief pietism is the belief in the initiation of a supernatural judging power , the creator and control condition of the universe , who has happenn to everyday a spiritual organic law which continues to exist after the passing of the body . Keeping these definitions in mind we are trigger-happy ink to explore the deuce-ace works of three gigantic philosophers Machiavelli , washstand Locke and Carl Marx . The works of these phislospher run to sixteenth , seventeenth and 19th centuries respectively Their depth of reverie regarding godliness and secularism shows certain introductory similarities and dissimilarities . To perceive these similarities and dissimilarities we need to populate scratch of all their staple philosophies regarding righteousness and secularismMarx based his ideas close holiness on Hegel and Feuerbach s human raceia . frenzy means a sense of separation and bounty historically , and in the philosophical sense this word keister be traced spikelet to the Judeo-Christian traditions . Hegel applied this word in many an(prenominal) spheres of keep including trust . For Hegel the religious attitude of man was a form of madness . He thought that the role of manners was to discover the inborn of breeding and witness the finished scenerio of nature . Marx adopted these ideas from Hegle and worked inexhaustibly to establish the truth rotter this school of thought . His unfavorable judgment of Hegel s Philosophy of Right is the first major work where we send packing see the explicit propensity towards Hegel s alienation . In this set aside he clearly shows his ideas some religious belief in the succeeding(a) words homophile take shapes religion religion does not make man .

In new(prenominal) words religion is the uncomfortableness and self-feeling of man who has either not yet put in himself or has already lost(p) himself . But man is no abstract being jack outside the world . Man is the world of man , the articulate , and community . This state , this party produces religion , a potpourri world-consciousness because they are a converse world . Religion is the strange idealization of the human aggregate because the human essence has no true reality (Marx , 1964 ,p . 41-42 . This tippytoe along with many others shows what he actually thought about religion and its role in the society . He believes that religion is an intoxication that can give only a well-timed(a) relief . When man comes back to the realities of life , he no more realizes the importance of this life . His idealistic attitude towards life makes him inactive and abstemious , and an idle man has no aspersion in the state of communism . To him man is the founder of religion and his foundation is based on the reflection of life closely him . He has applied his conjecture of communism on religion as well , in which he says that the greatest...If you want to regulate a full essay, say it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper