Moral Reflection

(Name (Professor (Subjectxx February 2008Moral ReflectionEveryday in our lives we ar forced into making moral decisions roughly some(prenominal)thing under the sun . There are situations that make such(prenominal) process difficult , and there are situations where the resolvent appears to be just right in front of our faces . I conceive it would be difficult for anyone to decide on any respectable dilemma if he has no clear idea of moralityPerson onlyy , I am aware that of at least two honest principles that guide me in my effortless ethical decision-making . These are utilitarianism and Kantian moral philosophy . utilitarianism holds that a someone s fermention would be get a lineed morally right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest compute of people . Thus , utilitarianism as a moral philosophy places emphasis on the consequences of human action rather than on the motives behind such action (West . On the other go past Kantian moral philosophy , or more popularly known as the categorical imperative , is based on notions of obligation , necessity and reason Kant hoped that morality consists in the choosing and doing tight-laced conduct , and the proper action is bring downd solely by discerning considerations . Thus , Kant holds that subjective considerations including emotions , should not be considered in moral decision-making (The Internet Encyclopedia of PhilosophyI believe in two these theories and I use them both when I decide everyday ethical dilemmas . There are times when . I believe purely rational considerations should prevail , but there are times that I also consider subjective factors bid emotions . I believe that both theories guide my actions and decisions , and both surrender me to weigh various considerations in my mindNevertheless , I believe that Kant s method acting in determining the right conduct is a punter decision-making process , because Kant provded clear criteria for choosing .

Kant provided this rule , thus So act , that the rule on which thou actest would admit of being espouse as a law by all rational beings (KantThis rule is easier to follow since it does not fluctuate dep last on my modality or subjective predilection , which could change in any day . It serves as a true north which teaches all men how to think and decide moral dilemmasOne moral resultant that deeply concerns me is euthanasia , or mercy killing . euthanasia is defined as an act characterized by the intentional ending of a patient s life by a atomic number 101 , usually by lethal injection (Religion Facts Euthanasia is continuously being raised as an option where a person is with a terminal illness and slim chances of recovering . It is an authorised issue for me because I could easily imagine myself in the beat of the sick person s family , and I could imagine subjective feelings that would dictate either euthanasia or maintaining life support . In these kinds of situations , utilitarianism could support either position , as the decision would work out on the consequences of an action . On the other hand , Kantian philosophy could provide a more definitive answer , but such answer would definitely not consider emotions , because...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper