John Berger

QUESTIONS FOR A SECOND READING #2 Berger argues that the go byation of Hals visualize is a case of mystification because the unnamed art historian canvas the painting in a much detailed, overlooked right smart rather than looking at it by its feelings and emotions at the corresponding time. Berger defines mystification as the process of explaining what is evident. It is an attempt to prevent us from very seeing the image for what it really says. The historian sees what is really depicted on the painting just by sodding(a) at it but it is not self-evident because breaking wipe out the painting into its smallest detail is far from seeing it as a whole and for what its worth. It takes an expert to really see a painting because experts like Berger knows how to situate theirselves on the artists life. They know how to interpret and see the flair an artist should see. Berger not only sees the images in churches as circumstances of them, he also distinguishes original whole kit of art and their reproductions by knowing the originality and uniqueness of it before it goes through the process of reproduction.

As Berger states, reproduction isolates a detail of a painting from the whole. The detail is transformed. (Ways of Seeing, 154) He proves this by stating that an allegorical work becomes a portrait of a girl. Berger sees images in a bureau where there is meaning in it. Every detail, every part of an artwork has its own story, its own meaning. The dynamic relationship among what we know and what we see develops into a system where our past changes the way we see things. In my opinion, Berger believes that for us to really see the image clearly, we have to let go of ourselves first and to the full understand art and its history by living in it. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper